Emperor is a pedophile.

(The account in question named himself Emperor1 but on other instances he appears as EMPEROR, as well as on his previous account here, for which he presumably lost the password. For simplicity, I'll just be referring to him as Emperor.)

A few months ago, I became aware of some... weird undertones in a number of Emperor's posts. Emperor was a prolific replier and as time went on, more and more replies seemed to be related to pedophilia, even when it was only tangentially mentioned/implied - or not at all.
(He does this at length in the first attached thread, which manages to stay mostly on track up until the last dozens of posts where it gently pivots into deconstructing child molestation.)

Now granted, these isolated non-sequitur replies form a pretty poor indictment - partly through how carefully most of them are worded - and even after the first thread, I was reluctant to use my admin powers against Emperor since he didn't actually partake in any illegal activity or go against the rules. Luckily in the second and third thread, he manages to explain himself at length, even though a big part of it is still just snake-like attempts to confound and a lot of "do you have a source for that? can you prove this? do you have a study for this claim?".
(Notice especially the attempt to turn the third thread into defence of pedophilia near the start... so graceful and non-transparent!)

So yeah, pedophiles aren't welcome here.

Thread 1 (163 posts, 7.7MB)

Thread 2 (60 posts, 2.5MB)

Thread 3 (180 posts, 7.5MB)